Monash students block CCP takeover
By Colin Twiggs
September 11, 2019 9:30 p.m. EDT (11:30 a.m. AEST)
First, please read the Disclaimer.
Important News
Dear Friends,
I have been writing the Trading Diary newsletter for almost 20 years. It has been a great success but times are changing. Advertisers have largely migrated to Google & social media and independent advertising through brokers has slowed to a trickle. We have therefore decided to change the format of the newsletter in line with these developments.
In future, market analysis will be provided by way of subscription through The Patient Investor. The format will remain the same, with regular updates focused on major markets — stocks, precious metals, commodities, interest rates and the economy — and increased coverage of sectors and industries.
While the change may seem sudden, the changes in advertising revenue have been evident for more than a year and I have been postponing the inevitable for some time.
Details of subscriptions are available at The Patient Investor and include a $1 subscription for the first month.
Thank you for your support.
Overrun Monash students block Chinese takeover
By David Lewellyn-Smith
Republished with permission from Macrobusiness
Via The Age:
International students have been banned from contesting student elections at one of Victoria’s most prestigious universities, in a move to stop a group of Chinese students seizing control of the student union.
…Leaders of Monash University’s Caulfield campus student body last week passed a new rule that students wishing to run at next week’s election must be eligible to work 22 hours per week.
Foreigners on student visas are not allowed to work more than 20 hours per week, meaning more than half the campus’ students are barred from running for election.
The international student group, which is considering legal action to fight the ruling, was tipped to comfortably win the election and take over the union.
More at SMH:
Monash University’s senior management is working behind closed doors with the student union to resolve the matter and avoid creating a perception that international students are discriminated against on campus.
International students — which make up 62 per cent of the campus population, more than double the national average — bring in a large proportion of the university’s revenue.
A candidate on the international student ticket and president of the university’s Chinese association attacked the ban and accused the student union’s leadership of disadvantaging Chinese student groups.
“We think this is a biased, racist decision against Chinese students and other international students,” Jack Guo said.
…National Union of Students international student officer Alex Wang said the move was an “affront to the democratic process”.
Let’s put aside the race baiting. What genius at Monash stuffed a single campus with 62% international students? It’s no wonder local kids feel they need to fight back, especially when mainland Chinese influence in particular has already shut down debates around freedom and Hong Kong. Local kids have effectively been ghettoised.
International students should have representation in student bodies and the experience of democracy itself is good for suppressed Chinese. But these numbers are preposterous given what we know about campus community and the deleterious impact on pedagogical standards of too many international students. As Professor Salvatore Babones argues today:
Addressing the National Press Club earlier this year in her role as chair of Universities Australia, Monash University vice-chancellor Margaret Gardner boasted that Australian universities have been 'incredibly successful' competitors in the international education marketplace....
Australia ranks third in the world in the number of international higher education students, trailing only the United States and the United Kingdom. Australia has more than twice as many as Canada, which has a population 50 per cent larger than Australia's.
Measured on a per capita basis, Australia now hosts more international students than any other major country in the world. They make up 3.6 per cent of Australia's total population, with international higher education students alone accounting for 1.5 per cent of Australia's population.
At most of Australia's universities, international students now account for more than 20 per cent of total enrollment. At Sydney, Melbourne, and ANU the figure is more than one-third. At the Sydney and Melbourne business schools, it's more than two-thirds, with data not published for ANU.
No public university in the entire United States even comes close to these concentrations of international students. Only one, the University of California at San Diego, has more than half of the international student concentrations of Sydney, Melbourne, and ANU. If Australian public universities were included in an international student league table alongside American public universities, the Australians would fill all 20 slots at the top of the table and 31 of the top 33.
Which all raises the question: how much is too much?
If the most successful American public universities are any guide, when it comes to international students, 10 per cent adds diversity to the student body, 15 per cent is the maximum reasonable level, and 20 per cent represents internationalisation gone wild. In Australia, the average level of international students across the entire university system is 26.7 per cent. By any reasonable standard, that's too high.
Australian universities have jumped the shark. International student numbers need to be halved.
Comment
More intrigue from the CCP's United Front Work Department. The only part of the article I disagree with is the heading.
"....students block Chinese takeover" should be "....students block CCP takeover."
We need to make a clear distinction between the two. One is an industrious nation of more than a billion people, scattered around the globe, who have made an enormous contribution to economic progress and global civilization. The other is a ruthless, autocratic regime, run on Leninist principles, that seized power 70 years ago and is willing to enslave and shed the blood of millions to protect and entrench their privileged position.
Colin Twiggs
Latest
-
Gold
Correction likely as Yuan finds support. -
Global Economy
A sobering assessment [VIDEO]. -
ASX
Expect stubborn resistance. -
Australia
The elephant in the room -
S&P 500
Buying pressure but payrolls disappoint. -
Global economy
Approaching stall speed. -
The long game
Why the West is losing. -
S&P 500
A good time to be cautious. -
PEmax
Why you should be wary of Robert Shiller's CAPE -
Portfolio
Investing in a volatile market - April 2018
Disclaimer
Colin Twiggs is director of The Patient Investor Pty Ltd, an Authorised Representative (no. 1256439) of MoneySherpa Pty Limited which holds Australian Financial Services Licence No. 451289.
Everything contained in this web site, related newsletters, training videos and training courses (collectively referred to as the "Material") has been written for the purpose of teaching analysis, trading and investment techniques. The Material neither purports to be, nor is it intended to be, advice to trade or to invest in any financial instrument, or class of financial instruments, or to use any particular methods of trading or investing.
Advice in the Material is provided for the general information of readers and viewers (collectively referred to as "Readers") and does not have regard to any particular person's investment objectives, financial situation or needs. Accordingly, no Reader should act on the basis of any information in the Material without properly considering its applicability to their financial circumstances. If not properly qualified to do this for themselves, Readers should seek professional advice.
Investing and trading involves risk of loss. Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results.
The decision to invest or trade is for the Reader alone. We expressly disclaim all and any liability to any person, with respect of anything, and of the consequences of anything, done or omitted to be done by any such person in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Material.
Please read the Financial Services Guide.